dsmiley commented on code in PR #1053: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1053#discussion_r1008392932
########## solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/handler/admin/api/DeleteReplicaPropertyAPITest.java: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more + * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with + * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ + +package org.apache.solr.handler.admin.api; + +import static org.apache.solr.cloud.api.collections.CollectionHandlingUtils.SHARD_UNIQUE; +import static org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers.any; +import static org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers.anyLong; +import static org.mockito.Mockito.mock; +import static org.mockito.Mockito.verify; +import static org.mockito.Mockito.when; + +import io.opentracing.noop.NoopSpan; +import java.util.Map; +import java.util.Optional; +import org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4; +import org.apache.solr.cloud.OverseerSolrResponse; +import org.apache.solr.cloud.api.collections.DistributedCollectionConfigSetCommandRunner; +import org.apache.solr.common.SolrException; +import org.apache.solr.common.cloud.ZkNodeProps; +import org.apache.solr.common.util.NamedList; +import org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer; +import org.apache.solr.request.SolrQueryRequest; +import org.apache.solr.response.SolrQueryResponse; +import org.junit.Before; +import org.junit.BeforeClass; +import org.junit.Test; +import org.mockito.ArgumentCaptor; + +/** Unit tests for {@link DeleteReplicaPropertyAPI} */ +public class DeleteReplicaPropertyAPITest extends SolrTestCaseJ4 { + + private CoreContainer mockCoreContainer; + private DistributedCollectionConfigSetCommandRunner mockCommandRunner; + private SolrQueryRequest mockQueryRequest; + private SolrQueryResponse queryResponse; + private ArgumentCaptor<ZkNodeProps> messageCapturer; + + private DeleteReplicaPropertyAPI deleteReplicaPropApi; + + @BeforeClass + public static void ensureWorkingMockito() { + assumeWorkingMockito(); + } + + @Before + public void setUp() throws Exception { + super.setUp(); + + mockCoreContainer = mock(CoreContainer.class); + mockCommandRunner = mock(DistributedCollectionConfigSetCommandRunner.class); + when(mockCoreContainer.getDistributedCollectionCommandRunner()) + .thenReturn(Optional.of(mockCommandRunner)); + when(mockCommandRunner.runCollectionCommand(any(), any(), anyLong())) + .thenReturn(new OverseerSolrResponse(new NamedList<>())); + mockQueryRequest = mock(SolrQueryRequest.class); + when(mockQueryRequest.getSpan()).thenReturn(NoopSpan.INSTANCE); + queryResponse = new SolrQueryResponse(); + messageCapturer = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(ZkNodeProps.class); + + deleteReplicaPropApi = + new DeleteReplicaPropertyAPI(mockCoreContainer, mockQueryRequest, queryResponse); + } + + @Test + public void testReportsErrorWhenCalledInStandaloneMode() { + when(mockCoreContainer.isZooKeeperAware()).thenReturn(false); + + final SolrException e = + expectThrows( + SolrException.class, + () -> { + deleteReplicaPropApi.deleteReplicaProperty( + "someColl", "someShard", "someReplica", "somePropName"); + }); + assertEquals(400, e.code()); + assertTrue( + "Exception message differed from expected: " + e.getMessage(), + e.getMessage().contains("not running in SolrCloud mode")); + } + + @Test + public void testCreatesValidOverseerMessage() throws Exception { Review Comment: You're right that a SolrCloud API integration test would involve running Jetty & ZK. That is certainly a subset of the API surface area though. For those tests, I would hope that variations of a single API (e.g. tests all its input variations) could be in the same test class using a common running instance. For non-SolrCloud tests, especially after a great test refactor to be based on SolrClients, they would run with EmbeddedSolrServer (not Jetty) but could be toggled to a Jetty mode on a nightly job, say; even SolrCloud. To be clear, I'm talking about one test class that is able to run in different modes based on say a system property toggle. I do this at work now and I've done it in the past to great effect. Maybe that's only partly related to our discussion above (how to test the API); but I want to get your reaction any way. Of course we have real unit tests for some low-level things too :-) If V1 is merely going to be calling V2 (yay!!), then I agree we can have real unit tests that only test that mechanism in isolation. Still, there's how you test the primary API (V2). We already have tests for these in general, albeit using V1? They can be changed to use V2. I may be talking past you in a sense... but I wanted to get this out there and maybe circle back to your ideas. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
