dsmiley commented on PR #1793: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1793#issuecomment-1661072747
I think I'm not going to attempt what I proposed. At least the use of Jackson is optional. Which is to say, if there is a client that is just doing index/query then it need not include our new "api" module either. We still have our current hand-written APIs for typical administrative things too. I could imagine 10.0 embracing the new API & Jackson but what I said (about Jackson & "api" being kind of optional) is for 9.x. I don't think we should bother shading Jackson unless we get input to the contrary. If we don't use tons of Jackson's surface area, might as well just expose the dependency and let the user choose the version they want, probably a future version that doesn't even exist right now. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
