[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17750365#comment-17750365
]
Jason Gerlowski edited comment on SOLR-16875 at 8/2/23 2:36 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
bq. One reason to maybe DO the backport now is so that in 9.4 we could at least
start warning folks that the post.jar will be going away, but not actually
remove it till 10?
Backporting makes sense to me, once you're happy with the "baking" and as long
as post.jar sticks around on branch_9x. It keeps branch_9x and main a little
closer together, gets the word out that post.jar will be going away, and gets
the presumably nicer {{bin/solr post}} interface into people's hands earlier.
was (Author: gerlowskija):
bq. One reason to maybe DO the backport now is so that in 9.4 we could at least
start warning folks that the post.jar will be going away, but not actually
remove it till 10?
Backporting makes sense to me, once you're happy with the "baking". It keeps
branch_9x and main a little closer together, gets the word out that post.jar
will be going away, and gets the presumably nicer {{bin/solr post}} interface
into people's hands earlier.
> Resolve Fate of bin/post and the SimplePostTool code base.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-16875
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16875
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: cli
> Affects Versions: main (10.0)
> Reporter: Eric Pugh
> Priority: Major
>
> Following up from SOLR-6994, we still generate a post.jar as a separate
> artifact, and we now have competing PostTool.java and SimplePostTool.java.
> Get consensus on the future of the post.jar in 10x?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
