[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17765358#comment-17765358 ]
Paul McArthur commented on SOLR-16403: -------------------------------------- I've been working on an idea to use a cluster singleton to periodically find and remove inactive shards, and have a draft [PR #1926|https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1926] open for comments. At this point, I'm looking for some feedback on whether this proposal is reasonable, or if there are other preferred alternatives. > SPLITSHARD should delete the parent shard after success > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-16403 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16403 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: SolrCloud > Reporter: David Smiley > Priority: Major > Time Spent: 20m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > When a shard is split into two sub-shards, the parent (the original) will > remain in an "INACTIVE" state. It's up to the user/admin to devise some > clean-up process. I propose that SplitShardCmd clean up after itself. It's > not clear why it didn't do this all along. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org