[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17766997#comment-17766997
]
Noble Paul edited comment on SOLR-16691 at 9/20/23 5:29 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------
{quote}should we deprecate JsonResponseWriter now that we have
JacksonJsonWriter?
{quote}
Yes. We should deprecate JsonResponseWriter. There is no need to maintain any
custom JSON library in Solr
{quote}In short, the [json.wrf
parameter|https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/response-writers.html#json-wrf]
is no longer working as of 9.3.{quote}
We should open a ticket for the same and implement this
{quote}I also noticed that the ref-guide's discussion of writers still lists
"JsonResponseWriter" as the default. Should that be updated to
"JacksonJsonWriter"? {quote}
Yes
was (Author: noble.paul):
{quote}should we deprecate JsonResponseWriter now that we have
JacksonJsonWriter?
{quote}
Yes. We should deprecate JsonResponseWriter. There is no need to maintain any
custom JSON library in Solr
{quote}In short, the [json.wrf
parameter|https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/response-writers.html#json-wrf]
is no longer working as of 9.3.{quote}
We should open a ticket for the same and implement this
> Use Jackson for JSON serialization
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-16691
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16691
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Noble Paul
> Assignee: Noble Paul
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 9.3
>
> Time Spent: 2.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> A user has reported significant performance gains from using Jackson over our
> homegrown JSON writer
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
