[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17789605#comment-17789605 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-16974: -------------------------------------------------------- Commit 6b2660edc2052b36ff20ec5e3b972d18a8829d7d in solr's branch refs/heads/branch_9x from Jan Høydahl [ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=solr.git;h=6b2660edc20 ] SOLR-16974: Documentation and changes entry for global CB (9x) (#2094) (cherry picked from commit 2bbb06aac63ec2ec94aab73874f09959b39f881f) > Global Circuit Breakers > ----------------------- > > Key: SOLR-16974 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16974 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Circuit Breakers > Reporter: Jan Høydahl > Assignee: Jan Høydahl > Priority: Major > Fix For: 9.5 > > Time Spent: 6h 50m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Currently Circuit Breakers are configured per core in solrconfig.xml. > However, cores/collections do not live in isolation, and it could be that a > cluster administrator would like to enforce circuit breakers for the entire > cluster. > I'm not clear as to whether we need both cluster level and a core level > pluggability. And would core-level breakers add to any cluster-level ones or > override them for that core? > A potential design is to add this as a new plugin in solr.xml, and have them > added in a new static context of CircuitBreakerRegistry. Then the isTripped > logic would consult both the per-core list and the static/global list of > breakers. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org