solrbot opened a new pull request, #2136:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2136

   This PR contains the following updates:
   
   | Package | Type | Update | Change |
   |---|---|---|---|
   | [com.tdunning:t-digest](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest) | 
dependencies | minor | `3.1` -> `3.3` |
   
   ---
   
   ### Release Notes
   
   <details>
   <summary>tdunning/t-digest (com.tdunning:t-digest)</summary>
   
   ### 
[`v3.2`](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/blob/HEAD/RELEASE-NOTES.md#Release-32)
   
   \===========
   In release 3.2, the goal is to produce an update to the code given the large 
number of improvements since the previous release.
   
   There are a few bugs that will survive this release, most notably in the 
AVLTreeDigest. These have to do with large numbers of repeated data points and 
are not new bugs.
   
   There is also a lot of work going on with serialization. I need to hear from 
people about  what they are doing with serialization so that we can build some 
test cases to allow an appropriate migration strategy to future serialization.
   
   The paper continues to be updated. The algorithmic descriptions are getting 
reasonably clear, but the speed and accuracy sections need a complete revamp 
with current implementations.
   
   ## Bugs, fixed and known
   
   ##### Fixed
   
   The following important issues are fixed in this release
   
   [Issue #&#8203;90](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/90) 
Serialization for MergingDigest
   
   [Issue #&#8203;92](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/92) 
Serialization for AVLTreeDigest
   
   ##### Maybe fixed
   
   This issue has substantial progress, but lacks a definitive test to 
determine whether it should be closed.
   
   [Issue 78](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/78) Stability under 
merging.
   
   ##### Pushed
   
   The following issues are pushed beyond this release
   
   [Issue #&#8203;87](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/87) Future 
proof and extensible serialization
   
   [Issue #&#8203;89](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/89) Bad 
handling for duplicate values in AVLTreeDigest
   
   ##### All fixed issues
   
   Here is a complete list of issues resolved in this release:
   
   [Issue #&#8203;55](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/55) Add time
   decay to t-digest
   
   [Issue #&#8203;52](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/52) General
   factory method for "fromBytes"
   
   [Issue #&#8203;90](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/90)
   Deserialization of MergingDigest BufferUnderflowException in 3.1
   
   [Issue #&#8203;92](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/92) Error in
   AVLTreeDigest.fromBytes
   
   [Issue #&#8203;93](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/93) high
   centroid frequency causes overflow - giving incorrect results
   
   [Issue #&#8203;67](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/67) Release 
of
   version 3.2
   
   [Issue #&#8203;81](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/81)
   AVLTreeDigest with a lot of datas : integer overflow
   
   [Issue #&#8203;75](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/75) 
Adjusting
   the centroid threshold values to obtain better accuracy at interesting
   values
   
   [Issue #&#8203;74](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/74) 
underlying
   distribution : powerlaw
   
   [Issue #&#8203;72](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/72) Inverse
   quantile algorithm is non-contiguous
   
   [Issue #&#8203;65](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/65)
   totalDigest add spark dataframe column / array
   
   [Issue #&#8203;60](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/60) Getting
   IllegalArgumentException when adding digests
   
   [Issue #&#8203;53](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/53)
   smallByteSize methods are very trappy in many classes -- should be
   changed or have warnings in javadocs
   
   [Issue #&#8203;82](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/82) TDigest
   class does not implement Serializable interface in last release.
   
   [Issue #&#8203;42](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/42) 
Histogram
   
   [Issue #&#8203;40](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/40) Improved
   constraint on centroid sizes
   
   [Issue #&#8203;37](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/37) Allow
   arbitrary scaling laws for centroid sizes
   
   [Issue #&#8203;29](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/29) Test
   method testScaling() always adds values in ascending order
   
   [Issue #&#8203;84](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/84) Remove
   deprecated kinds of t-digest
   
   [Issue #&#8203;76](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/76) Add
   serializability
   
   [Issue #&#8203;77](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/77) 
Question:
   Proof of bounds on merging digest size
   
   [Issue #&#8203;71](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/71) Simple
   alternate algorithm using maxima, ranks and fixed cumulative weighting
   
   [Issue #&#8203;61](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/61) Possible
   improvement to the speed of the algorithm
   
   [Issue #&#8203;58](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/58) jdk8
   doclint incompatibility
   
   [Issue #&#8203;48](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/48) Build is
   unstable under some circumstances
   
   [Issue #&#8203;63](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/63) Which
   TDigest do you recommend?
   
   [Issue #&#8203;62](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/62) Very 
slow
   performance; what am I missing?
   
   [Issue #&#8203;47](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/47) Make
   TDigest serializable
   
   [Issue #&#8203;49](https://togithub.com/tdunning/t-digest/issues/49)
   MergingDigest.centroids is wrong on an empty digest
   
   </details>
   
   ---
   
   ### Configuration
   
   📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - "* * * * *" (UTC), Automerge - At any time 
(no schedule defined).
   
   🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are 
satisfied.
   
   â™» **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry 
checkbox.
   
   🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update 
again.
   
   ---
   
    - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this 
box
   
   ---
   
   This PR has been generated by [Renovate 
Bot](https://togithub.com/solrbot/renovate-github-action)
   
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNy44Ny4yIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiMzcuODcuMiIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6Im1haW4ifQ==-->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to