cpoerschke commented on PR #2508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2508#issuecomment-2176622969

   > Can you recommend a way to benchmark this myself, like if I wanted to 
tweak it to see how my ideas work out?
   
   I've shared the "just pass an executor" patch onto a Solr 9.5 cloud that I 
used, in case that's useful.
   
   The benchmarking experiments I ran used Python's `threading` module and (I 
think under the hood) `pysolr` also, measuring `QTime`/elapsed time/CPU 
utilisation, for example. My experiments were for dense vector search, I 
haven't yet looked into if/how other searches might use the passed in executor 
at the Lucene level. But it would be worth mentioning at this point that the 
collection was quite multi-sharded i.e. that being independent of the type of 
search being run.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to