[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17867758#comment-17867758
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-17321:
-------------------------------------
If we bring the URL/URI business to 9x, _ideally_ it would have its own JIRA
because the Java 21 issue (this issue) isn't going to 9x yet we'd like this
part in 9x. The "Fix Version" for this issue will be main (10) but the URL/URI
could then be 9.7. But this URL/URI business is minor internal stuff that
should affect nobody so I'm comfortable with less bureaucracy here. At least
clarify this very much in the commit message to 9x to say this is a *part of*
SOLR-17321 . Also, in 9x if any part gives us grief, we can skip those parts.
We're only partially bringing some aspects to 9x to align the branches more.
> Bump minimum required Java version to 21
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-17321
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17321
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Sanjay Dutt
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 9h 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We are upgrading the minimum Java version for Solr main branch to 21.
> However, at the same, It has been suggested to be not so aggressive with
> SolrJ (and thus solr-api, a dependency) Java version – setting it to 17.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
