[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17868373#comment-17868373
 ] 

Christine Poerschke commented on SOLR-17298:
--------------------------------------------

{quote}* The code presents a possibility for users to receive a non-numeric max 
score ("NaN").
{quote}
I'd be interested in investigating this, appreciate any pointers but will also 
just have a look around in the meantime. Thanks!

> Multithreaded search breaks limits, and possibly other things
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-17298
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17298
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: search
>    Affects Versions: main (10.0), 9.7, 9x
>            Reporter: Gus Heck
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13350 was merged to main somewhat 
> unexpectedly, and then back-ported to 9x without any response to feedback 
> from multiple committers, including feedback that
>  * By turning it on by default, it breaks the recently released CPU limits 
> (as shown by changes to unit tests).
>  * Incompatibility with timeAllowed, cpuTimeAllowed, segmentTerminateEarly, 
> GraphQuery, RankQuery and JoinQuery was not clearly documented
>  * The code presents a possibility for users to receive a non-numeric max 
> score ("NaN").
> I have not verified it yet, but I would also be worried about the health of 
> CPU time logging to be added in 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16986 after this change.
> Given that:
>  * Some of the above issues represent back compatibility breaks or potential 
> back compatibility breaks for released features
>  * The decision to break compatibility within the 9x release series deserves 
> a formal vote (or a fix).
>  * There has been no communication/response from the committer who merged 
> these changes since May 6 (aside from the backport to 9x on May 13) it seems 
> that this state may persist for some time.
> Therefore it appears necessary to file this issue to ensure anything but a 
> 9.6.1 is blocked until the above issues are sorted out. This ticket can serve 
> as a parent ticket to whatever various solutions are agreed upon.
> Multi-threaded search is an awesome feature that has taken a very long time 
> to be realized and is obviously desirable, but we have now placed ourselves 
> in an awkward position by not resolving these last few issues before back 
> porting.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to