[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17886947#comment-17886947
 ] 

Tim Owen commented on SOLR-17477:
---------------------------------

The way I connect this into Solr is firstly changing my solrconfig.xml to 
declare the custom ValueSourceParser class

{{<valueSourceParser name="agg_myagg" 
class="com.mycompany.solr.MyAggValueSourceParser" />}}

And that class contains a static initialiser which registers itself with the 
code change I made to FacetParser:

{{public class MyAggValueSourceParser extends ValueSourceParser {}}

{{  static {}}

{{    FacetParser.ParseHandler handler = (p, k, a) -> parseStructure(a);}}

{{    FacetParser.registerParseHandler("myagg", handler);}}

{{  }}}

{{  @Override}}
{{  public ValueSource parse(FunctionQParser fp) throws SyntaxError { ...}}

{{{}  public static AggValueSource parseStructure(Object arg){}}}{{{}{ ... 
{}}}{{}}

> Allow plugin code to define custom aggregates
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-17477
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17477
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: Facet Module, Plugin system
>            Reporter: Tim Owen
>            Priority: Major
>
> Continuing the work done in SOLR-8673 and also addressing a TODO in the code, 
> I've worked on making it easier for custom plugin code to define aggregates 
> to be used in Json Faceting.
> Currently you can mostly define a custom ValueSourceParser and AggValueSource 
> in plugin code (i.e. outside of the {{org.apache.solr.search.facet}} package) 
> but there are still some classes and fields that are not public or protected 
> which make it hard to write a sortable aggregate or use some of the useful 
> built-in SlotAcc implementations.
> Another current limitation is that you can only call a custom aggregate by 
> using the simple functional style syntax e.g. 
> {{"mycalc":"myagg(somefield,2)"}} and not the json structured style e.g. it 
> would be good to be able to support "mycalc":{ type:myagg, f:somefield, 
> limit:2 }
> instead. There is a TODO in the code to support the registration of these 
> types.
> PR addresses these and has been tested using a custom plugin to check it all 
> works together. This allowed us to move a lot of our custom code out of our 
> local Solr build and into a plugin.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to