[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17934031#comment-17934031
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-17510:
-------------------------------------
[~gus], responding to you months later but the direction we're going in is to
improve the maintenance of the Solr project by avoiding custom formats we need
to support – basically, longer term removing "javabin". CBOR is comparable and
yet we don't need to maintain it. In theory it should only be marginally more
work than JSON *if* Solr's JSON support was Jackson based, but it isn't. A
stepping stone on this journey is switching Jackson. This direction is linked
to the (new) V2 API because that API is POJO marshall/unmarshall based (with
annotations), using Jackson. Javabin doesn't have a role in this future.
{quote}We should be using JsonMapResponseParser (which is Jackson based)
{quote}
Correcting myself – it is {*}not{*}; it's Noggit based.
> Umbrella: CBOR, SolrJ compatible
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-17510
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17510
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SolrJ
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Priority: Major
>
> Here we propose a CBOR compatible SolrJ. Today, SolrJ only supports javabin
> and XML.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
