epugh commented on code in PR #3464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3464#discussion_r2279060424


##########
dev-docs/overseer/overseer.adoc:
##########
@@ -404,7 +402,8 @@ Otherwise, if the `Session` is already busy (`isBusy()`) at 
the requested lock l
 
 If the `Session` is not busy, an attempt is made to grab the lock on the 
corresponding `Node` of the `LockTree`. By calling its `root.lock()` method 
with appropriate params (see next section for details).
 
-If the lock can’t be obtained on the `LockTree`, the `Session` marks the 
requested node as busy (and just this one, not the whole path) in 
`SessionNode.markBusy()`. This doesn’t necessarily make sense to me (I would 
have expected the node to be marked as busy when the lock was obtained? EDIT: 
this makes more sense now, see 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14546?focusedCommentId=17128157&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-17128157[comment
 on SOLR-14546]), but if as stated above a new session is created each time, 
this marking busy doesn’t matter much (doesn’t make any difference actually). +
+If the lock can’t be obtained on the `LockTree`, the `Session` marks the 
requested node as busy (and just this one, not the whole path) in 
`SessionNode.markBusy()`. This doesn’t necessarily make sense to me (I would 
have expected the node to be marked as busy when the lock was obtained? EDIT: 
this makes more sense now, see 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14546?focusedCommentId=17128157&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin
+.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-17128157[comment on SOLR-14546]), 
but if as stated above a new session is created each time, this marking busy 
doesn’t matter much (doesn’t make any difference actually). +

Review Comment:
   argh...  a `.system`!  I think my code editor highlited all of them, not the 
one I wanted to delete!



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to