[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18053635#comment-18053635
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-18079:
-------------------------------------
bq. I would prefer to stay away from XML magic with xinclude etc
That statement confuses me and I disagree. When I think "magic", I think maybe
hidden/secret/implicit is what is meant as synonyms. An xinclude definitley
isn't that; it's the opposite since a user would "see" it and could even google
it if they didn't understand it. It's named well and a user is likely to guess
correctly what it does. If we were to add "magic" around xinclude, I could
imagine special names on the value that get resolved internally like "IMPLICIT"
or some-such if we want that.
bq. and instead configure thorugh java logic...
Wow. I prefer the opposite -- we configure with configuration files that are
not code (e.g. XML, JSON, YAML, really whatever but not executable/compilable
code).
> Allow users to provide their own ImplicitPlugins.json
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-18079
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18079
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: config-api
> Reporter: Eric Pugh
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 1.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> If you want to control the plugins instantiated as part of setting up Solr,
> then you might want to have your own ImplicitPlugins.json
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
