[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18069722#comment-18069722
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-12861:
-------------------------------------
I think I disagree with this. Why introduce a new factory when the existing
one is named well? That is, why not just change RAMDirectoryFactory to create
ByteBuffersDirectory? Seems like a needless change to impose on users / tests.
> Add Solr factory for new ByteBuffersDirectory
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12861
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12861
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Steven Rowe
> Assignee: Steven Rowe
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 7.6, 8.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-12861.patch
>
>
> LUCENE-8438 and sub-tasks introduced ByteBuffersDirectory, a RAMDirectory
> replacement. Solr needs a factory class in order to expose it to end-users.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
