[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18076001#comment-18076001
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-18179:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit 79e18af99325377e025e48ba84ee5dd5bd3cff41 in solr's branch
refs/heads/branch_10x from Eric Pugh
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=solr.git;h=79e18af9932 ]
SOLR-18179: Better highlight and expand upon our Cluster concepts in the Ref
Guide (#4246)
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot]
<[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: epugh <[email protected]>
> Update Concepts and Glossary Ref Guide pages around Cloud/Cluster concepts
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-18179
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18179
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: documentation
> Reporter: Eric Pugh
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 3h 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Following up on this message in a dev list thread
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread/rcm372jwzmnmpjno9ygto82z8hptvkw1] about the
> names of things, I noticed that we bury our "These are what cluster types"
> are page deep in ref guide, not up front. Yet choosing Cloud versus User
> Managed is a key decision right at the beginning, not a "and we are going to
> prod" decision. At least with todays split in the apis etc ;)
> This PR is to work on getting consistency of terms across the Ref Guide.
> Bonus points if it helps with consistency in both the new Solr UI, and maybe
> in the old Solr Admin.
> Less concerned about any naming ramifications in source code...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
