[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15213059#comment-15213059
 ] 

burness duan commented on SPARK-3220:
-------------------------------------

I have use this Derrick's kmeans, It is efficient in our project  for a 12 
million points(300 dimensionality). I run the spark mllib kmeans in 6.9h (2000 
clustering). While, It only took less than 2h when i use Derrick's one.

> K-Means clusterer should perform K-Means initialization in parallel
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-3220
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3220
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: MLlib
>            Reporter: Derrick Burns
>              Labels: clustering
>
> The LocalKMeans method should be replaced with a parallel implementation.  As 
> it stands now, it becomes a bottleneck for large data sets. 
> I have implemented this functionality in my version of the clusterer.  
> However, I see that there are hundreds of outstanding pull requests.  If 
> someone on the team wants to sponsor the pull request, I will create one.  
> Otherwise, I will just maintain my own private fork of the clusterer.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to