[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15248335#comment-15248335
]
Shivaram Venkataraman commented on SPARK-14326:
-----------------------------------------------
I think its fine to support this in StructField / other schema specification
that we use to pass information to Scala. I don't think adding a int64
dependency is necessarily something we should do as per the discussion in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12360
> Can't specify "long" type in structField
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-14326
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14326
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SparkR
> Affects Versions: 1.6.0
> Reporter: Dmitriy Selivanov
>
> tried `long`, `bigint`, `LongType`, `Long`. Nothing works...
> {code}
> schema <- structType(structField("id", "long"))
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
