[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15494475#comment-15494475
]
Michael Armbrust edited comment on SPARK-16407 at 9/15/16 8:42 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure, but the bar for compatibility is different for things in explicit user
facing APIs (DataFrame/StreamReader/Writer) than for stuff that involves
implementing interfaces defined in packages that are documented as internal
({{org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.\*}}, {{org.apache.spark.sql.execution.\*}})
was (Author: marmbrus):
Sure, but the bar for compatibility is different for things in explicit user
facing APIs (DataFrame/StreamReader/Writer) than for stuff that involves
implementing interfaces defined in packages that are documented as internal
(org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.*, org.apache.spark.sql.execution.*)
> Allow users to supply custom StreamSinkProviders
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-16407
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16407
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Streaming
> Reporter: holdenk
>
> The current DataStreamWriter allows users to specify a class name as format,
> however it could be easier for people to directly pass in a specific provider
> instance - e.g. for user equivalent of ForeachSink or other sink with
> non-string parameters.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
