[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15508260#comment-15508260 ]
Frederick Reiss commented on SPARK-16407: ----------------------------------------- It looks like there is a general agreement here that Structured Streaming ought to have some way to direct the output of a streaming query to the Spark driver. But there is a disagreement about what shape that API should take. Can we have a discussion on this thread about what would be an acceptable design to meet this requirement, or would it be better to move over to the dev list? > Allow users to supply custom StreamSinkProviders > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: SPARK-16407 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16407 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Streaming > Reporter: holdenk > > The current DataStreamWriter allows users to specify a class name as format, > however it could be easier for people to directly pass in a specific provider > instance - e.g. for user equivalent of ForeachSink or other sink with > non-string parameters. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org