[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15538078#comment-15538078
]
Reynold Xin edited comment on SPARK-17619 at 10/1/16 7:23 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
It seems really strange to add support for this specific case, when it is
doable via UDF. I'm going to close this as won't fix for now until we hear a
stronger argument for it.
On a related topic, I think it'd be useful to have general support for
array_exists that takes in a function as input, but that would require higher
order functions in SQL!
was (Author: rxin):
It seems really strange to add support for this specific case, when it is
doable via UDF. I'm going to close this as won't fix for now until we hear a
stronger argument for it.
On a related topic, I think it'd be useful to have general support for
array_exists that takes in a function as input, but that would require allowing
lambda in SQL!
> To add support for pattern matching in ArrayContains Expression.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-17619
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17619
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Priyanka Garg
>
> To add support for pattern matching in ArrayContains Expression.
> Array Contains currently only matches the exact value as of now... there
> should be support for pattern matching as well.
> For eg. arrayContains(Seq("\\d*", "\\s*"), "100") returns true.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
