[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15651806#comment-15651806
]
Saikat Kanjilal edited comment on SPARK-9487 at 11/9/16 7:22 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ok , for some odd reason my local branch had the changes but weren't committed,
PR is here:
https://github.com/skanjila/spark/commit/ec0b2a81dc8362e84e70457873560d997a7cb244
I added the change to local[4] to both streaming as well as repl, based on what
I'm seeing locally all Java/Scala changes should be accounted for and unit
tests pass, the only exception is the code inside spark examples in
PageViewStream.scala, should I change this, seems like it doesn't belong as
part of the unit tests.
My next TODOs:
1) Change the example code if it makes sense in PageViewStream
2) Start the code changes to fix the python unit tests
Let me know thoughts or concerns.
was (Author: kanjilal):
Ok , for some odd reason my local branch had the changes but weren't committed,
PR is here:
https://github.com/skanjila/spark/commit/ec0b2a81dc8362e84e70457873560d997a7cb244
I added the change to local[4] to both streaming as well as repl, based on what
I'm seeing locally all Java/Scala changes should be accounted for except for
spark examples with the code inside PageViewStream.scala, should I change this,
seems like it doesn't belong as part of the unit tests.
My next TODOs:
1) Change the example code if it makes sense in PageViewStream
2) Start the code changes to fix the python unit tests
Let me know thoughts or concerns.
> Use the same num. worker threads in Scala/Python unit tests
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-9487
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9487
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: PySpark, Spark Core, SQL, Tests
> Affects Versions: 1.5.0
> Reporter: Xiangrui Meng
> Labels: starter
> Attachments: ContextCleanerSuiteResults, HeartbeatReceiverSuiteResults
>
>
> In Python we use `local[4]` for unit tests, while in Scala/Java we use
> `local[2]` and `local` for some unit tests in SQL, MLLib, and other
> components. If the operation depends on partition IDs, e.g., random number
> generator, this will lead to different result in Python and Scala/Java. It
> would be nice to use the same number in all unit tests.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
