Hamel Ajay Kothari created SPARK-18479:
------------------------------------------

             Summary: spark.sql.shuffle.partitions defaults should be a prime 
number
                 Key: SPARK-18479
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18479
             Project: Spark
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: SQL
    Affects Versions: 2.0.2
            Reporter: Hamel Ajay Kothari


For most hash bucketing use cases it is my understanding that a prime value, 
such as 199, would be a safer value than the existing value of 200. Using a 
non-prime value makes the likelihood of collisions much higher when the hash 
function isn't great.

Consider the case where you've got a Timestamp or Long column with millisecond 
times at midnight each day. With the default value for 
spark.sql.shuffle.partitions, you'll end up with 120/200 partitions being 
completely empty.

Looking around there doesn't seem to be a good reason why we chose 200 so I 
don't see a huge risk in changing it. 




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to