[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15944799#comment-15944799
 ] 

Herman van Hovell commented on SPARK-20122:
-------------------------------------------

Yeah, I totally missed that. Anyway, you need to add a rule to 
{{CheckAnalysis}} for this.

> Analyzer reports "unresolved operator 'Aggregate" for nonexistent window 
> specifications
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-20122
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20122
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Jacek Laskowski
>            Priority: Minor
>
> {{Analyzer}} should be more elaborate on the root cause of the 
> {{org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException}} when {{WindowSpecReference}} 
> cannot be resolved.
> I think the real issue is that {{AstBuilder}} creates a lookup table for 
> {{WindowSpecDefinition}}s per name and when it cannot resolve 
> {{WindowSpecReference}} it simply fails analysis (it's too early in the SQL 
> parsing).
> {code}
> scala> val table = spark.emptyDataset[Int]
> table: org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[Int] = [value: int]
> scala> table.selectExpr("count() OVER nonexistentWindowSpec")
> org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: unresolved operator 'Aggregate 
> [unresolvedwindowexpression(count(), 
> WindowSpecReference(nonexistentWindowSpec)) AS 
> unresolvedwindowexpression(count())#15];;
> 'Aggregate [unresolvedwindowexpression(count(), 
> WindowSpecReference(nonexistentWindowSpec)) AS 
> unresolvedwindowexpression(count())#15]
> +- LocalRelation <empty>, [value#11]
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.failAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:40)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.failAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:90)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$3.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:408)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$$anonfun$checkAnalysis$3.apply(CheckAnalysis.scala:407)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.trees.TreeNode.foreachUp(TreeNode.scala:127)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.CheckAnalysis$class.checkAnalysis(CheckAnalysis.scala:407)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer.checkAnalysis(Analyzer.scala:90)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.QueryExecution.assertAnalyzed(QueryExecution.scala:53)
>   at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset$.ofRows(Dataset.scala:67)
>   at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.org$apache$spark$sql$Dataset$$withPlan(Dataset.scala:2832)
>   at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.select(Dataset.scala:1137)
>   at org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset.selectExpr(Dataset.scala:1172)
>   ... 48 elided
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to