[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Owen updated SPARK-20588:
------------------------------
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> from_utc_timestamp causes bottleneck
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-20588
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20588
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 2.0.2
> Environment: AWS EMR AMI 5.2.1
> Reporter: Ameen Tayyebi
>
> We have a SQL query that makes use of the from_utc_timestamp function like
> so: from_utc_timestamp(itemSigningTime,'America/Los_Angeles')
> This causes a major bottleneck. Our exact call is:
> date_add(from_utc_timestamp(itemSigningTime,'America/Los_Angeles'), 1)
> Switching from the above to date_add(itemSigningTime, 1) reduces the job
> running time from 40 minutes to 9.
> When from_utc_timestamp function is used, several threads in the executors
> are in the BLOCKED state, on this call stack:
> "Executor task launch worker-63" #261 daemon prio=5 os_prio=0
> tid=0x00007f848472e000 nid=0x4294 waiting for monitor entry
> [0x00007f501981c000]
> java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
> at java.util.TimeZone.getTimeZone(TimeZone.java:516)
> - waiting to lock <0x00007f5216c2aa58> (a java.lang.Class for
> java.util.TimeZone)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.DateTimeUtils$.stringToTimestamp(DateTimeUtils.scala:356)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util.DateTimeUtils.stringToTimestamp(DateTimeUtils.scala)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.agg_doAggregateWithKeys$(Unknown
> Source)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator.processNext(Unknown
> Source)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
> at
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anonfun$8$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:370)
> at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.hasNext(Iterator.scala:408)
> at
> org.apache.spark.shuffle.sort.UnsafeShuffleWriter.write(UnsafeShuffleWriter.java:161)
> at
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:79)
> at
> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ShuffleMapTask.runTask(ShuffleMapTask.scala:47)
> at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:86)
> at
> org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:274)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> Can we cache the locale's once per JVM so that we don't do this for every
> record?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
