[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15998189#comment-15998189
]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-20608:
--------------------------------------
User 'morenn520' has created a pull request for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17872
> Standby namenodes should be allowed to included in
> yarn.spark.access.namenodes to support HDFS HA
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-20608
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20608
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Spark Submit, YARN
> Affects Versions: 2.0.1, 2.1.0
> Reporter: Yuechen Chen
> Priority: Minor
> Original Estimate: 672h
> Remaining Estimate: 672h
>
> If one Spark Application need to access remote namenodes,
> yarn.spark.access.namenodes should be only be configged in spark-submit
> scripts, and Spark Client(On Yarn) would fetch HDFS credential periodically.
> If one hadoop cluster is configured by HA, there would be one active namenode
> and at least one standby namenode.
> However, if yarn.spark.access.namenodes includes both active and standby
> namenodes, Spark Application will be failed for the reason that the standby
> namenode would not access by Spark for org.apache.hadoop.ipc.StandbyException.
> I think it won't cause any bad effect to config standby namenodes in
> yarn.spark.access.namenodes, and my Spark Application can be able to sustain
> the failover of Hadoop namenode.
> HA Examples:
> Spark-submit script:
> yarn.spark.access.namenodes=hdfs://namenode01,hdfs://namenode02
> Spark Application Codes:
> dataframe.write.parquet(getActiveNameNode(...) + hdfsPath)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
