[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16205655#comment-16205655 ]
Fernando Pereira commented on SPARK-22276: ------------------------------------------ I added a simple example that shows what I mean. You see two exchanges, even though data is already partitioned according to the same field. I wonder if the Exchange hashpartitioning is really needed, since in my case it just slows things down. Thanks > Unnecessary repartitioning > -------------------------- > > Key: SPARK-22276 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22276 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Optimizer > Affects Versions: 2.2.0 > Reporter: Fernando Pereira > > When a dataframe is sorted it is partitioned with a RangePartitioner. > If later we aggregate by the exact same fields over which sort was applied > there is a new (apparently useless) Exchange repartitioning by a > HashPartitioner. > In my use case the groupBy exchange is still very costly as the aggregate > function won't reduce the data volume. > Is there any reason why groupBy always shuffles data, or could this be > improved? > Is there currently a way to workaround for the moment, without going to > mapPartitions? > Example > {code} > nrn_vals.printSchema() > (nrn_vals > .sort("post_gid") > .groupBy("post_gid") > .agg(F.collect_list("pre_gid").alias("pre_gids")) > ).explain() > {code} > Outputs the following > {code} > root > |-- pre_gid: integer (nullable = true) > |-- post_gid: integer (nullable = true) > |-- floatvec: array (nullable = false) > | |-- element: float (containsNull = true) > == Physical Plan == > ObjectHashAggregate(keys=[post_gid#1386], > functions=[collect_list(pre_gid#1385, 0, 0)]) > +- Exchange hashpartitioning(post_gid#1386, 1) > +- ObjectHashAggregate(keys=[post_gid#1386], > functions=[partial_collect_list(pre_gid#1385, 0, 0)]) > +- *Sort [post_gid#1386 ASC NULLS FIRST], true, 0 > +- Exchange rangepartitioning(post_gid#1386 ASC NULLS FIRST, 1) > +- *FileScan parquet [pre_gid#1385,post_gid#1386] Batched: true, > Format: Parquet, Location: > InMemoryFileIndex[file:/media/psf/Home/dev/Functionalizer/pyspark/spykfunc_output/extended_touche..., > PartitionFilters: [], PushedFilters: [], ReadSchema: > struct<pre_gid:int,post_gid:int> > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org