[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16209289#comment-16209289
]
Randy Tidd commented on SPARK-22296:
------------------------------------
Potentially similar to SPARK-16792
> CodeGenerator - failed to compile when constructor has
> scala.collection.mutable.Seq vs. scala.collection.Seq
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-22296
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22296
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Optimizer
> Affects Versions: 2.1.0
> Reporter: Randy Tidd
>
> This is with Scala 2.11.
> We have a case class that has a constructor with 85 args, the last two of
> which are:
> var chargesInst :
> scala.collection.mutable.Seq[ChargeInstitutional] =
> scala.collection.mutable.Seq.empty[ChargeInstitutional],
> var chargesProf :
> scala.collection.mutable.Seq[ChargeProfessional] =
> scala.collection.mutable.Seq.empty[ChargeProfessional]
> A mutable Seq in a the constructor of a case class is probably poor form but
> Scala allows it. When we run this job we get this error:
> build 17-Oct-2017 05:30:50 2017-10-17 09:30:50 [Executor task launch
> worker-1] ERROR o.a.s.s.c.e.codegen.CodeGenerator - failed to compile:
> org.codehaus.commons.compiler.CompileException: File 'generated.java', Line
> 8217, Column 70: No applicable constructor/method found for actual parameters
> "java.lang.String, java.lang.String, long, java.lang.String, long, long,
> long, java.lang.String, long, long, double, scala.Option, scala.Option,
> java.lang.String, java.lang.String, long, java.lang.String, java.lang.String,
> java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, int,
> java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String,
> java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String,
> java.lang.String, java.lang.String, long, long, long, long, long,
> scala.Option, scala.Option, scala.Option, scala.Option, scala.Option,
> java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String,
> java.lang.String, java.lang.String, long, java.lang.String, int, double,
> double, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, long,
> java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, long,
> long, long, long, java.lang.String, com.xyz.xyz.xyz.domain.Patient,
> com.xyz.xyz.xyz.domain.Physician, scala.collection.Seq, scala.collection.Seq,
> java.lang.String, long, java.lang.String, int, int, boolean, boolean,
> scala.collection.Seq, boolean, scala.collection.Seq, boolean,
> scala.collection.Seq, scala.collection.Seq"; candidates are:
> "com.xyz.xyz.xyz.domain.Account(java.lang.String, java.lang.String, long,
> java.lang.String, long, long, long, java.lang.String, long, long, double,
> scala.Option, scala.Option, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, long,
> java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String,
> java.lang.String, java.lang.String, int, java.lang.String, java.lang.String,
> java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String,
> java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, long,
> long, long, long, long, scala.Option, scala.Option, scala.Option,
> scala.Option, scala.Option, java.lang.String, java.lang.String,
> java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, long,
> java.lang.String, int, double, double, java.lang.String, java.lang.String,
> java.lang.String, long, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String,
> java.lang.String, long, long, long, long, java.lang.String,
> com.xyz.xyz.xyz.domain.Patient, com.xyz.xyz.xyz.domain.Physician,
> scala.collection.Seq, scala.collection.Seq, java.lang.String, long,
> java.lang.String, int, int, boolean, boolean, scala.collection.Seq, boolean,
> scala.collection.Seq, boolean, scala.collection.mutable.Seq,
> scala.collection.mutable.Seq)"
> The relevant lines are:
> build 17-Oct-2017 05:30:50 /* 093 */ private scala.collection.Seq
> argValue84;
> build 17-Oct-2017 05:30:50 /* 094 */ private scala.collection.Seq
> argValue85;
> and
> build 17-Oct-2017 05:30:54 /* 8217 */ final
> com.xyz.xyz.xyz.domain.Account value1 = false ? null : new
> com.xyz.xyz.xyz.domain.Account(argValue2, argValue3, argValue4, argValue5,
> argValue6, argValue7, argValue8, argValue9, argValue10, argValue11,
> argValue12, argValue13, argValue14, argValue15, argValue16, argValue17,
> argValue18, argValue19, argValue20, argValue21, argValue22, argValue23,
> argValue24, argValue25, argValue26, argValue27, argValue28, argValue29,
> argValue30, argValue31, argValue32, argValue33, argValue34, argValue35,
> argValue36, argValue37, argValue38, argValue39, argValue40, argValue41,
> argValue42, argValue43, argValue44, argValue45, argValue46, argValue47,
> argValue48, argValue49, argValue50, argValue51, argValue52, argValue53,
> argValue54, argValue55, argValue56, argValue57, argValue58, argValue59,
> argValue60, argValue61, argValue62, argValue63, argValue64, argValue65,
> argValue66, argValue67, argValue68, argValue69, argValue70, argValue71,
> argValue72, argValue73, argValue74, argValue75, argValue76, argValue77,
> argValue78, argValue79, argValue80, argValue81, argValue82, argValue83,
> argValue84, argValue85);
> In short, Spark uses scala.collection.Seq in the generated code which is not
> compatible with scala.collection.mutable.Seq in our case class, which results
> in a failure at runtime.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
