[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16240284#comment-16240284
 ] 

Yan Facai (颜发才) commented on SPARK-3383:
----------------------------------------

[~WeichenXu123] Good work! I'd like to take a look if time allows. Anyway, I 
believe that unordered features can benefit a lot from the PR.

> DecisionTree aggregate size could be smaller
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-3383
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3383
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: MLlib
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.0
>            Reporter: Joseph K. Bradley
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Storage and communication optimization:
> DecisionTree aggregate statistics could store less data (described below).  
> The savings would be significant for datasets with many low-arity categorical 
> features (binary features, or unordered categorical features).  Savings would 
> be negligible for continuous features.
> DecisionTree stores a vector sufficient statistics for each (node, feature, 
> bin).  We could store 1 fewer bin per (node, feature): For a given (node, 
> feature), if we store these vectors for all but the last bin, and also store 
> the total statistics for each node, then we could compute the statistics for 
> the last bin.  For binary and unordered categorical features, this would cut 
> in half the number of bins to store and communicate.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to