[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16297307#comment-16297307
]
Thomas Graves commented on SPARK-22765:
---------------------------------------
yes between stages becomes a problem with lower timeout, we can certainly look
at extending across stages but that isn't really what you are proposing here,
mr style is to release immediately and not reuse. That also kind of implies a
slightly higher timeout would be good unless you have very large time between
stages which would again probably favor small timeout to release and then
reacquire.
how much time are you having between stages?
Or perhaps we need 2 timeouts one for running stage and one for between stages,
but that is somewhat contradictory unless a lot of tasks finish all at the same
time, but even then the timeout for running stages as 0 would have released the
container immediately anyway. So I'm a bit confused by your statement.
> Create a new executor allocation scheme based on that of MR
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-22765
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22765
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Scheduler
> Affects Versions: 1.6.0
> Reporter: Xuefu Zhang
>
> Many users migrating their workload from MR to Spark find a significant
> resource consumption hike (i.e, SPARK-22683). While this might not be a
> concern for users that are more performance centric, for others conscious
> about cost, such hike creates a migration obstacle. This situation can get
> worse as more users are moving to cloud.
> Dynamic allocation make it possible for Spark to be deployed in multi-tenant
> environment. With its performance-centric design, its inefficiency has also
> unfortunately shown up, especially when compared with MR. Thus, it's believed
> that MR-styled scheduler still has its merit. Based on our research, the
> inefficiency associated with dynamic allocation comes in many aspects such as
> executor idling out, bigger executors, many stages (rather than 2 stages only
> in MR) in a spark job, etc.
> Rather than fine tuning dynamic allocation for efficiency, the proposal here
> is to add a new, efficiency-centric scheduling scheme based on that of MR.
> Such a MR-based scheme can be further enhanced and be more adapted to Spark
> execution model. This alternative is expected to offer good performance
> improvement (compared to MR) still with similar to or even better efficiency
> than MR.
> Inputs are greatly welcome!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
