[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16422078#comment-16422078
]
Takeshi Yamamuro commented on SPARK-23797:
------------------------------------------
I think this ticket seems to be invalid here, so you need to ask in spark-users
(or spark-dev if necessary) first.
> SparkSQL performance on small TPCDS tables is very low when compared to Drill
> or Presto
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-23797
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23797
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Optimizer, Spark Submit, SQL
> Affects Versions: 2.3.0
> Reporter: Tin Vu
> Priority: Major
>
> I am executing a benchmark to compare performance of SparkSQL, Apache Drill
> and Presto. My experimental setup:
> * TPCDS dataset with scale factor 100 (size 100GB).
> * Spark, Drill, Presto have a same number of workers: 12.
> * Each worked has same allocated amount of memory: 4GB.
> * Data is stored by Hive with ORC format.
> I executed a very simple SQL query: "SELECT * from table_name"
> The issue is that for some small size tables (even table with few dozen of
> records), SparkSQL still required about 7-8 seconds to finish, while Drill
> and Presto only needed less than 1 second.
> For other large tables with billions records, SparkSQL performance was
> reasonable when it required 20-30 seconds to scan the whole table.
> Do you have any idea or reasonable explanation for this issue?
> Thanks,
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
