[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16432244#comment-16432244
 ] 

Thomas Graves commented on SPARK-16630:
---------------------------------------

yes I think it would make sense as the union of all blacklisted nodes.

I'm not sure what you mean by your last question.  The expiry currently is all 
handled in the BlacklistTracker, I wouldn't want to move that out into the yarn 
allocator.  Just use the information passed to it unless there is a case it 
doesn't cover?

> Blacklist a node if executors won't launch on it.
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-16630
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16630
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: YARN
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.2
>            Reporter: Thomas Graves
>            Priority: Major
>
> On YARN, its possible that a node is messed or misconfigured such that a 
> container won't launch on it.  For instance if the Spark external shuffle 
> handler didn't get loaded on it , maybe its just some other hardware issue or 
> hadoop configuration issue. 
> It would be nice we could recognize this happening and stop trying to launch 
> executors on it since that could end up causing us to hit our max number of 
> executor failures and then kill the job.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to