[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16650817#comment-16650817
]
Daniel Darabos commented on SPARK-20144:
----------------------------------------
Thanks, those are good questions.
# The global option is not great, but it's the simplest. The code is already
controlled by two global options. ({{spark.sql.files.maxPartitionBytes}} and
{{spark.sql.files.openCostInBytes}}.) Why not one more?
# I'm not sure what {{LOAD DATA INPATH}} does. (Sorry...) But sure, users can
put random-name files in the directory and mess stuff up. Best protection
against that is not putting random-name files in the directory. :D
# The whole problem is not Parquet-specific. It affects all file types. The
{{part-00001}} naming comes from Hadoop's
[FileOutputFormat|https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/release-2.7.1/hadoop-mapreduce-project/hadoop-mapreduce-client/hadoop-mapreduce-client-core/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapreduce/lib/output/FileOutputFormat.java#L270].
It's been like this forever and will never change. (I'd say it's more than a
convention.)
> spark.read.parquet no long maintains ordering of the data
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-20144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20144
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 2.0.2
> Reporter: Li Jin
> Priority: Major
>
> Hi, We are trying to upgrade Spark from 1.6.3 to 2.0.2. One issue we found is
> when we read parquet files in 2.0.2, the ordering of rows in the resulting
> dataframe is not the same as the ordering of rows in the dataframe that the
> parquet file was reproduced with.
> This is because FileSourceStrategy.scala combines the parquet files into
> fewer partitions and also reordered them. This breaks our workflows because
> they assume the ordering of the data.
> Is this considered a bug? Also FileSourceStrategy and FileSourceScanExec
> changed quite a bit from 2.0.2 to 2.1, so not sure if this is an issue with
> 2.1.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
