[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16664293#comment-16664293
]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-25840:
--------------------------------------
User 'dongjoon-hyun' has created a pull request for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22840
> `make-distribution.sh` should not fail due to missing LICENSE-binary
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-25840
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25840
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Build
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: Dongjoon Hyun
> Priority: Major
>
> We vote for the artifacts. All releases are in the form of the *source*
> materials needed to make changes to the software being released.
> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#artifacts
> From Spark 2.4.0, the source artifact and binary artifact starts to contain
> own proper LICENSE files (LICENSE, LICENSE-binary). It's great to have them.
> However, unfortunately, `dev/make-distribution.sh` inside source artifacts
> start to fail because it expects `LICENSE-binary` and source artifact have
> only the LICENSE file.
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v2.4.0-rc4-bin/spark-2.4.0.tgz
> `dev/make-distribution.sh` is used during the voting phase because we are
> voting on that source artifact instead of GitHub repository.
> This issue aims to recover that script to work in any way. This doesn't aim
> for source artifacts to reproduce the compiled artifacts.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
