[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16717182#comment-16717182 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on SPARK-26337: ---------------------------------------- SparkQA removed a comment on issue #23284: [SPARK-26337][SQL][TEST] Add benchmark for LongToUnsafeRowMap URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/23284#issuecomment-446143804 **[Test build #99964 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/99964/testReport)** for PR 23284 at commit [`fa70205`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/fa702056efb1cd1a8a635c05908964d8ad96bb3a). ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Add benchmark for LongToUnsafeRowMap > ------------------------------------ > > Key: SPARK-26337 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26337 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Test > Components: SQL > Affects Versions: 3.0.0 > Reporter: Liang-Chi Hsieh > Priority: Major > > Regarding the performance issue of SPARK-26155, I think it is better to add a > benchmark for LongToUnsafeRowMap which is the root cause of performance > regression. It can be easier to show performance difference between different > metric implementation in LongToUnsafeRowMap. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org