[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16860922#comment-16860922
 ] 

zhengruifeng commented on SPARK-24875:
--------------------------------------

The <label, score> dataset is usually much smaller than the training dataset 
containing <features>,

if the score data is to huge to perform a simple op like countByValue, how 
could you train the model?

I doubt whether it is worth to apply a approximation.

> MulticlassMetrics should offer a more efficient way to compute count by label
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-24875
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24875
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: MLlib
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.1
>            Reporter: Antoine Galataud
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Currently _MulticlassMetrics_ calls _countByValue_() to get count by 
> class/label
> {code:java}
> private lazy val labelCountByClass: Map[Double, Long] = 
> predictionAndLabels.values.countByValue()
> {code}
> If input _RDD[(Double, Double)]_ is huge (which can be the case with a large 
> test dataset), it will lead to poor execution performance.
> One option could be to allow using _countByValueApprox_ (could require adding 
> an extra configuration param for MulticlassMetrics).
> Note: since there is no equivalent of _MulticlassMetrics_ in new ML library, 
> I don't know how this could be ported there.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to