[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14278983#comment-14278983 ]
Al M commented on SPARK-5270: ----------------------------- I just noticed that rdd.partitions.size is set to 0 for empty RDDs and > 0 for RDDs with data; this is a far more elegant check than the others. > Elegantly check if RDD is empty > ------------------------------- > > Key: SPARK-5270 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5270 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 1.2.0 > Environment: Centos 6 > Reporter: Al M > Priority: Trivial > > Right now there is no clean way to check if an RDD is empty. As discussed > here: > http://apache-spark-user-list.1001560.n3.nabble.com/Testing-if-an-RDD-is-empty-td1678.html#a1679 > I'd like a method rdd.isEmpty that returns a boolean. > This would be especially useful when using streams. Sometimes my batches are > huge in one stream, sometimes I get nothing for hours. Still I have to run > count() to check if there is anything in the RDD. I can process my empty RDD > like the others but it would be more efficient to just skip the empty ones. > I can also run first() and catch the exception; this is neither a clean nor > fast solution. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org