[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16997631#comment-16997631
]
Imran Rashid commented on SPARK-6235:
-------------------------------------
[~sammysheep] are you discussing the use case for task results > 2G? Or large
records? Or did you mean one of the parts that was supposed to be fixed in the
plan above?
I don't deny there is _some_ use for large task result -- I just haven't heard
much demand for it (in fact you're the first person I've heard from). Given
that, I don't expect to see it fixed immediately. You could open another jira,
though honestly for the moment I think it would be more of a place for folks to
voice their interest.
(I'm pretty sure nothing has changed since 2.4.0 on what is fixed and what is
not.)
> Address various 2G limits
> -------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-6235
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6235
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Umbrella
> Components: Shuffle, Spark Core
> Reporter: Reynold Xin
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.4.0
>
> Attachments: SPARK-6235_Design_V0.02.pdf
>
>
> An umbrella ticket to track the various 2G limit we have in Spark, due to the
> use of byte arrays and ByteBuffers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
