[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17005500#comment-17005500
 ] 

Maciej Szymkiewicz commented on SPARK-28264:
--------------------------------------------

Thanks [~hyukjin.kwon].

In general I think that this proposal is pretty good, as long as this variant 
of the API is made optional and alternative, old-style path, is provided (this 
is for example how 
[{{@functools.singledispatch}}|https://docs.python.org/3.8/library/functools.html#functools.singledispatch]
 works since Python 3.7). 


> Revisiting Python / pandas UDF
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-28264
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28264
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: PySpark, SQL
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Reynold Xin
>            Assignee: Reynold Xin
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> In the past two years, the pandas UDFs are perhaps the most important changes 
> to Spark for Python data science. However, these functionalities have evolved 
> organically, leading to some inconsistencies and confusions among users. This 
> document revisits UDF definition and naming, as a result of discussions among 
> Xiangrui, Li Jin, Hyukjin, and Reynold.
> -See document here: 
> [https://docs.google.com/document/d/10Pkl-rqygGao2xQf6sddt0b-4FYK4g8qr_bXLKTL65A/edit#|https://docs.google.com/document/d/10Pkl-rqygGao2xQf6sddt0b-4FYK4g8qr_bXLKTL65A/edit]-
>  New proposal: 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-kV0FS_LF2zvaRh_GhkV32Uqksm_Sq8SvnBBmRyxm30/edit?usp=sharing



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to