[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30629?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17023717#comment-17023717 ]
Maciej Szymkiewicz commented on SPARK-30629: -------------------------------------------- Makes sense. I guess if we have to choose between these two, recursive calls will be less common. I think that for now we should disable the test case (I've opened a PR for that), as it is clearly no longer applicable. > cleanClosure on recursive call leads to node stack overflow > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SPARK-30629 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30629 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Bug > Components: SparkR > Affects Versions: 3.0.0 > Reporter: Maciej Szymkiewicz > Priority: Major > > This problem surfaced while handling SPARK-22817. In theory there are tests, > which cover that problem, but it seems like they have been dead for some > reason. > Reproducible example > {code:r} > f <- function(x) { > f(x) > } > SparkR:::cleanClosure(f) > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org