[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17025117#comment-17025117
 ] 

Javier Fuentes commented on SPARK-28067:
----------------------------------------

The expected result here should be an ArithmeticException for all cases of 
precision > DecimalType.MAX_PRECISION?

> Incorrect results in decimal aggregation with whole-stage code gen enabled
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-28067
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28067
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.2, 2.1.3, 2.2.3, 2.3.4, 2.4.4, 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Mark Sirek
>            Priority: Blocker
>              Labels: correctness
>
> The following test case involving a join followed by a sum aggregation 
> returns the wrong answer for the sum:
>  
> {code:java}
> val df = Seq(
>  (BigDecimal("10000000000000000000"), 1),
>  (BigDecimal("10000000000000000000"), 1),
>  (BigDecimal("10000000000000000000"), 2),
>  (BigDecimal("10000000000000000000"), 2),
>  (BigDecimal("10000000000000000000"), 2),
>  (BigDecimal("10000000000000000000"), 2),
>  (BigDecimal("10000000000000000000"), 2),
>  (BigDecimal("10000000000000000000"), 2),
>  (BigDecimal("10000000000000000000"), 2),
>  (BigDecimal("10000000000000000000"), 2),
>  (BigDecimal("10000000000000000000"), 2),
>  (BigDecimal("10000000000000000000"), 2)).toDF("decNum", "intNum")
> val df2 = df.withColumnRenamed("decNum", "decNum2").join(df, 
> "intNum").agg(sum("decNum"))
> scala> df2.show(40,false)
>  ---------------------------------------
> sum(decNum)
> ---------------------------------------
> 40000000000000000000.000000000000000000
> ---------------------------------------
>  
> {code}
>  
> The result should be 1040000000000000000000.0000000000000000.
> It appears a partial sum is computed for each join key, as the result 
> returned would be the answer for all rows matching intNum === 1.
> If only the rows with intNum === 2 are included, the answer given is null:
>  
> {code:java}
> scala> val df3 = df.filter($"intNum" === lit(2))
>  df3: org.apache.spark.sql.Dataset[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] = [decNum: 
> decimal(38,18), intNum: int]
> scala> val df4 = df3.withColumnRenamed("decNum", "decNum2").join(df3, 
> "intNum").agg(sum("decNum"))
>  df4: org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame = [sum(decNum): decimal(38,18)]
> scala> df4.show(40,false)
>  -----------
> sum(decNum)
> -----------
> null
> -----------
>  
> {code}
>  
> The correct answer, 1000000000000000000000.0000000000000000, doesn't fit in 
> the DataType picked for the result, decimal(38,18), so an overflow occurs, 
> which Spark then converts to null.
> The first example, which doesn't filter out the intNum === 1 values should 
> also return null, indicating overflow, but it doesn't.  This may mislead the 
> user to think a valid sum was computed.
> If whole-stage code gen is turned off:
> spark.conf.set("spark.sql.codegen.wholeStage", false)
> ... incorrect results are not returned because the overflow is caught as an 
> exception:
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: requirement failed: Decimal precision 39 
> exceeds max precision 38
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to