[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14297105#comment-14297105
 ] 

Tor Myklebust commented on SPARK-5472:
--------------------------------------

Not sure what you mean by "essentially" here.

JdbcRDD gives you an RDD of Array[Object]'s or, if you specify a function that 
maps ResultSet rows to objects of your choosing, an RDD of some class of your 
choosing.  It doesn't natively produce Spark SQL DataFrames.  In order to get a 
DataFrame, you need an RDD of Row objects and their schema; a lot of the work 
here comes from type mapping between types in the external database and Spark 
SQL types.

JdbcRDD also doesn't expose itself as a data source in Spark SQL; you can't 
"CREATE TABLE foo USING something" with some options in Spark SQL in order to 
get a table named foo that really lives inside an external database.

> Add support for reading from and writing to a JDBC database
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-5472
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5472
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SQL
>            Reporter: Tor Myklebust
>            Priority: Minor
>
> It would be nice to be able to make a table in a JDBC database appear as a 
> table in Spark SQL.  This would let users, for instance, perform a JOIN 
> between a DataFrame in Spark SQL with a table in a Postgres database.
> It might also be nice to be able to go the other direction---save a DataFrame 
> to a database---for instance in an ETL job.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to