[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17155839#comment-17155839
 ] 

Apache Spark commented on SPARK-24985:
--------------------------------------

User 'sidedoorleftroad' has created a pull request for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29071

> Executing SQL with "Full Outer Join" on top of large tables when there is 
> data skew met OOM
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-24985
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24985
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.1
>            Reporter: sheperd huang
>            Priority: Major
>
> When we run SQL with "Full Outer Join" on large tables when there is data 
> skew, we found it's quite easy to hit OOM. We once thought we hit 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13450. But taking a look at fix 
> in [https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909,] we found that PR hasn't 
> handled the "Full Outer Join" case.
> The root cause of the OOM is there are a lot of rows with the same key.
> See below code:
> {code:java}
> private def findMatchingRows(matchingKey: InternalRow): Unit = {
>   leftMatches.clear()
>   rightMatches.clear()
>   leftIndex = 0
>   rightIndex = 0
>   while (leftRowKey != null && keyOrdering.compare(leftRowKey, matchingKey) 
> == 0)    {
>   leftMatches += leftRow.copy()
>   advancedLeft()
> }
>   while (rightRowKey != null && keyOrdering.compare(rightRowKey, matchingKey) 
> == 0) {
>      rightMatches += rightRow.copy()
>      advancedRight()
> }
> {code}
> It seems we haven't limited the data added to leftMatches and rightMatches.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to