[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17212635#comment-17212635
 ] 

Anurag Mantripragada edited comment on SPARK-30893 at 10/12/20, 7:56 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

As mentioned above in [~cloud_fan]'s comment, should we backport the 
nullability and datatype issues from this umbrella to branch-2.4 as they may 
cause corruption? 

CC: [~viirya], [~dongjoon]


was (Author: anuragmantri):
As mentioned here 
[#https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30893?focusedCommentId=17041618&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-17041618],
 should we backport the nullability and datatype issues from this umbrella to 
branch-2.4 as they may cause corruption? 

CC: [~viirya], [~dongjoon]

> Expressions should not change its data type/nullability after it's created
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-30893
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30893
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Wenchen Fan
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> This is a problem because the configuration can change between different 
> phases of planning, and this can silently break a query plan which can lead 
> to crashes or data corruption, if data type/nullability gets changed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to