[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
L. C. Hsieh resolved SPARK-36735.
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.3.0
Resolution: Fixed
Issue resolved by pull request 33975
[https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33975]
> Adjust overhead of cached relation for DPP
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-36735
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36735
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 3.3.0
> Reporter: L. C. Hsieh
> Assignee: L. C. Hsieh
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
>
> Currently we calculate if there is benefit of pruning with DPP by simply
> summing up the size of all scan relations as the overhead. However, for
> cached relations, the overhead should be different than a non-cached
> relation. This proposes to use adjusted overhead for cached relation with DPP.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
