[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17418301#comment-17418301 ]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-36819: -------------------------------------- User 'Swinky' has created a pull request for this issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34062 > DPP: Don't insert redundant filters in case static partition pruning can be > done > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SPARK-36819 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36819 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: SQL > Affects Versions: 3.1.2 > Reporter: Swinky Mann > Priority: Minor > > Don't insert dynamic partition pruning filters in case the filters already > referred statically. In case the filtering predicate on dimension table is in > joinKey, no need to insert DPP filter in that case. > DPP is not required in this Sample query: > {{SELECT f.date_id, f.pid, f.sid FROM > (select date_id, product_id as pid, store_id as sid from fact_stats) as f > JOIN dim_stats s > ON f.sid = s.store_id WHERE s.store_id = 3}} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org