[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-37391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Danny Guinther updated SPARK-37391:
-----------------------------------
    Description: 
The fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32001 ( 
[https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29024/files#diff-345beef18081272d77d91eeca2d9b5534ff6e642245352f40f4e9c9b8922b085R58]
 ) does not seem to have consider the reality that some apps may rely on being 
able to establish many JDBC connections simultaneously for performance reasons.

The fix forces concurrency to 1 when establishing database connections and that 
strikes me as a *significant* user impacting change and a *significant* 
bottleneck.

Can anyone propose a workaround for this? I have an app that makes connections 
to thousands of databases and I can't upgrade to any version >3.1.x because of 
this significant bottleneck.

 

Thanks in advance for your help!

  was:
The fix for SPARK-34497 ( 
[https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29024/files#diff-345beef18081272d77d91eeca2d9b5534ff6e642245352f40f4e9c9b8922b085R58|https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29024/files#diff-345beef18081272d77d91eeca2d9b5534ff6e642245352f40f4e9c9b8922b085R58]
 ) does not seem to have consider the reality that some apps may rely on being 
able to establish many JDBC connections simultaneously for performance reasons.

The fix forces concurrency to 1 when establishing database connections and that 
strikes me as a *significant* user impacting change and a *significant* 
bottleneck.

Can anyone propose a workaround for this? I have an app that makes connections 
to thousands of databases and I can't upgrade to any version >3.1.x because of 
this significant bottleneck.

 

Thanks in advance for your help!


> SIGNIFICANT bottleneck introduced by fix for SPARK-34497
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-37391
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-37391
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.0, 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.2.0
>         Environment: N/A
>            Reporter: Danny Guinther
>            Priority: Major
>
> The fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32001 ( 
> [https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29024/files#diff-345beef18081272d77d91eeca2d9b5534ff6e642245352f40f4e9c9b8922b085R58]
>  ) does not seem to have consider the reality that some apps may rely on 
> being able to establish many JDBC connections simultaneously for performance 
> reasons.
> The fix forces concurrency to 1 when establishing database connections and 
> that strikes me as a *significant* user impacting change and a *significant* 
> bottleneck.
> Can anyone propose a workaround for this? I have an app that makes 
> connections to thousands of databases and I can't upgrade to any version 
> >3.1.x because of this significant bottleneck.
>  
> Thanks in advance for your help!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to