[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-38445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Andersson updated SPARK-38445:
-------------------------------------
Description:
At the company I work at we're using Spark Structured Streaming to sink
messages on kafka to HDFS. We're in the late stages of migrating this component
to instead sink messages to AWS S3, and in connection with that we hit upon a
couple of issues regarding hadoop committers.
I've come to understand that the default "file" committer (documented
[here|https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable/hadoop-aws/tools/hadoop-aws/committers.html#Switching_to_an_S3A_Committer])
is unsafe to use in S3, which is why [this page in the spark
documentation|https://spark.apache.org/docs/3.2.1/cloud-integration.html]
recommends using the "directory" (i.e. staging) committer, and in later
versions of hadoop they also recommend to use the "magic" committer.
However, it's not clear whether spark structured streaming even use committers.
There's no "_SUCCESS" file in destination (as compared to normal spark jobs),
and the documentation regarding committers used in streaming is non-existent.
Can anyone please shed some light on this?
was:
At the company I work at we're using Spark Structured Streaming to sink
messages on kafka to HDFS. We're in the late stages of migrating this component
to instead sink messages to AWS S3, and in connection with that we hit upon a
couple of issues regarding hadoop committers.
I've come to understand that the default "file" committer (documented
[here|https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable/hadoop-aws/tools/hadoop-aws/committers.html#Switching_to_an_S3A_Committer])
is unsafe to use in S3, which is why [this page in the spark
documentation|https://spark.apache.org/docs/3.2.1/cloud-integration.html]
recommends using the "directory" (i.e. staging) committer, and later versions
also recommends to use the "magic" committer.
However, it's not clear whether spark structured streaming even use committers.
There's no "_SUCCESS" file in destination (as compared to normal spark jobs),
and the documentation regarding committers used in streaming is non-existent.
Can anyone please shed some light on this?
> Are hadoop committers used in Structured Streaming?
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-38445
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-38445
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Question
> Components: Spark Core
> Affects Versions: 3.2.1
> Reporter: Martin Andersson
> Priority: Major
> Labels: structured-streaming
>
> At the company I work at we're using Spark Structured Streaming to sink
> messages on kafka to HDFS. We're in the late stages of migrating this
> component to instead sink messages to AWS S3, and in connection with that we
> hit upon a couple of issues regarding hadoop committers.
> I've come to understand that the default "file" committer (documented
> [here|https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable/hadoop-aws/tools/hadoop-aws/committers.html#Switching_to_an_S3A_Committer])
> is unsafe to use in S3, which is why [this page in the spark
> documentation|https://spark.apache.org/docs/3.2.1/cloud-integration.html]
> recommends using the "directory" (i.e. staging) committer, and in later
> versions of hadoop they also recommend to use the "magic" committer.
> However, it's not clear whether spark structured streaming even use
> committers. There's no "_SUCCESS" file in destination (as compared to normal
> spark jobs), and the documentation regarding committers used in streaming is
> non-existent.
> Can anyone please shed some light on this?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
