[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14384690#comment-14384690
]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-5931:
-------------------------------------
User 'ilganeli' has created a pull request for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5236
> Use consistent naming for time properties
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-5931
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5931
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Spark Core
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0
> Reporter: Andrew Or
> Assignee: Andrew Or
>
> This is SPARK-5932's sister issue.
> The naming of existing time configs is inconsistent. We currently have the
> following throughout the code base:
> {code}
> spark.network.timeout // seconds
> spark.executor.heartbeatInterval // milliseconds
> spark.storage.blockManagerSlaveTimeoutMs // milliseconds
> spark.yarn.scheduler.heartbeat.interval-ms // milliseconds
> {code}
> Instead, my proposal is to simplify the config name itself and make
> everything accept time using the following format: 5s, 2ms, 100us. For
> instance:
> {code}
> spark.network.timeout = 5s
> spark.executor.heartbeatInterval = 500ms
> spark.storage.blockManagerSlaveTimeout = 100ms
> spark.yarn.scheduler.heartbeatInterval = 400ms
> {code}
> All existing configs that are relevant will be deprecated in favor of the new
> ones. We should do this soon before we keep introducing more time configs.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
