[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-44132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17736490#comment-17736490
 ] 

Steven Aerts commented on SPARK-44132:
--------------------------------------

[https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/41712] was created with a proposed fix 
and reproduction scenario for this problem.
Let me know if you prefer to update this Jira ticket, as it is still referring 
to the BeanEncoder which had nothing to do with it.

> nesting full outer joins confuses code generator
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-44132
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-44132
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.0, 3.4.0, 3.5.0
>         Environment: We verified the existence of this bug from spark 3.3 
> until spark 3.5.
>            Reporter: Steven Aerts
>            Priority: Major
>
> We are seeing issues with the code generator when querying java bean encoded 
> data with 2 nested joins.
> {code:java}
> dsA.join(dsB, seq("id"), "full_outer").join(dsC, seq("id"), "full_outer"); 
> {code}
> will generate invalid code in the code generator.  And can depending on the 
> data used generate stack traces like:
> {code:java}
>  Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
>         at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage6.smj_consumeFullOuterJoinRow_0$(Unknown
>  Source)
>         at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage6.wholestagecodegen_findNextJoinRows_0$(Unknown
>  Source)
>         at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage6.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>         at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
> {code}
> Or:
> {code:java}
>  Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: index (2) should < 2
>         at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeRow.assertIndexIsValid(UnsafeRow.java:118)
>         at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.UnsafeRow.isNullAt(UnsafeRow.java:315)
>         at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage6.smj_consumeFullOuterJoinRow_0$(Unknown
>  Source)
>         at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage6.processNext(Unknown
>  Source)
>         at 
> org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
> {code}
> When we look at the generated code we see that the code generator seems to be 
> mixing up parameters.  For example:
> {code:java}
> if (smj_leftOutputRow_0 != null) {                          //<==== null 
> check for wrong/left parameter
>   boolean smj_isNull_12 = smj_rightOutputRow_0.isNullAt(1); //<==== causes 
> NPE on right parameter here{code}
> It is as if the the nesting of 2 full outer joins is confusing the code 
> generator and as such generating invalid code.
> There is one other strange thing.  We found this issue when using data sets 
> which were using the java bean encoder.  We tried to reproduce this in the 
> spark shell or using scala case classes but were unable to do so. 
> We made a reproduction scenario as unit tests (one for each of the stacktrace 
> above) on the spark code base and made it available as a [pull 
> request|https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/41688] to this case.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to